Anscombe rejects both determinism and consequentialism. Her book Intention aims to shed light on the concept of intention, and hence on (intentional) action, and the difference between intentional, rational action and non-rational behavior.Similarly one may ask, what are Anscombe's objections to Kant's ethics?
On Anscombe's view modern theories such as Kantian ethics, Utilitarianism, and social contract theory are sorely inadequate for a variety of reasons, but one major worry is that they try to adopt the legalistic framework without the right background assumptions to ground it.
Similarly, does Modern Moral Philosophy rest on a mistake? Moral Philosophy Does Not Rest on a Mistake: Reasons to Be Moral Revisited.
Similarly, you may ask, what are Anscombe's objections to utilitarianism?
Her objection to consequentialism is that since it looks at consequences only, the character of the act itself is left out of account, and this has the unacceptable consequence that an agent is equally responsible for the foreseen but unintended consequences of an act, no matter whether the act is courageous or
What does deontological mean?
In moral philosophy, deontological ethics or deontology (from Greek δέον, deon, "obligation, duty") is the normative ethical theory that the morality of an action should be based on whether that action itself is right or wrong under a series of rules, rather than based on the consequences of the action.
What is Kantian theory?
Kantian ethics refers to a deontological ethical theory ascribed to the German philosopher Immanuel Kant. Central to Kant's construction of the moral law is the categorical imperative, which acts on all people, regardless of their interests or desires. Kant formulated the categorical imperative in various ways.What is consequentialist ethics?
Consequentialism is the class of normative ethical theories holding that the consequences of one's conduct are the ultimate basis for any judgment about the rightness or wrongness of that conduct. Consequentialist theories differ in how they define moral goods.What makes a person virtuous?
A virtuous person is a person who acts virtuously. A person acts virtuously if they "possess and live the virtues" A virtue is a moral characteristic that a person needs to live well.What are the five virtue ethics?
These theories include arete (excellence or virtue), phronesis (practical or moral wisdom), and eudaimonia (flourishing).What is an example of virtue ethics?
Honesty, courage, compassion, generosity, fidelity, integrity, fairness, self-control, and prudence are all examples of virtues. The virtuous person is the ethical person. At the heart of the virtue approach to ethics is the idea of "community".What kind of moral agent does Aristotle want?
According to Aristotle, it is the possession and use of practical knowledge that makes it possible to live a good life. Ethics and politics, which are the practical sciences, deal with human beings as moral agents.What is the concept of natural law?
Historically, natural law refers to the use of reason to analyze human nature to deduce binding rules of moral behavior from nature's or God's creation of reality and mankind. The concept of natural law was documented in ancient Greek philosophy, including Aristotle, and was referred to in Roman philosophy by Cicero.How is utilitarianism a consequentialist theory?
Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism because it rests on the idea that it is the consequences or results of actions, laws, policies, etc. that determine whether they are good or bad, right or wrong. In general, whatever is being evaluated, we ought to choose the one that will produce the best overall results.How is virtue ethics fundamentally different from both deontology and utilitarianism?
Instead of asking what is the right action here and now, virtue ethics asks what kind of person should one be in order to get it right all the time. Whereas deontology and consequentialism are based on rules that try to give us the right action, virtue ethics makes central use of the concept of character. 
